IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/stf/reljnl/v1y2026iid10.html

Unequal Progress and Barriers for Women in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Ondine Berland

  • Oliver Harman

  • Ninon Moreau-Kastler

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature on gender inequality in the academic field of economics, highlighting both the unequal progress that women have experienced and the persistent barriers that they continue to face. Our analysis of this recent research and available data highlights that the reduction in women’s absence in the field has been heterogeneous. While women now constitute 26% of published economists, their presence sharply declines at higher ranks, with only 5% representation among economists in the top percentile of research influence. Notably, recent progress has paradoxically concentrated at this highest level, indicating shifting institutional norms and evolving perceptions about women’s contributions. We further explore how understanding women’s behaviors and career choices, and gender biases in evaluation and workplace environments, contribute to women’s underrepresentation in the field. Our discussion extends to the labor market for economists, drawing parallels with broader labor trends and examining how gender-biased treatment and hiring processes affect women’s advancement. Finally, we turn to policy interventions that are key in promoting gender balance, focusing on networks, mentorship, role models, and representation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ondine Berland & Oliver Harman & Ninon Moreau-Kastler, 2026. "Unequal Progress and Barriers for Women in Economics," Reviews of Economic Literature, Stanford University Press, vol. 1.
  • Handle: RePEc:stf:reljnl:v:1:y:2026:i::id:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rel.journals.sup.org/index.php/rel/article/view/10/63
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stf:reljnl:v:1:y:2026:i::id:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maria Fitzgerald (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rel.journals.sup.org/index.php/rel/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.