IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouird/v7y2025i2p84-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-governance in South Africa: barriers and enablers of virtual evaluation in the public sector

Author

Listed:
  • Lesedi Senamele Matlala

    (University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

Virtual Evaluation (VE) has emerged as a valuable tool in public sector monitoring and evaluation (M&E), offering opportunities to enhance efficiency, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. The increasing emphasis on digital transformation in South Africa has led to growing interest in integrating VE into public sector evaluation processes. Despite this interest, there is limited empirical research on the factors that influence its adoption, particularly in government institutions responsible for M&E. Existing studies primarily focus on the benefits of VE, with little attention given to the challenges public officials face in implementing it effectively. This study aims to investigate the barriers and enablers affecting the adoption of VE in South Africa's public sector. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study draws insights from workshops hosted by the South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association (SAMEA), a survey with public sector officials, and key informant interviews with senior government evaluators. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Institutional Theory guide the research, which helps explain the technological and organizational dynamics influencing VE adoption. Preliminary analysis suggests that successful VE implementation depends on technological readiness, institutional support, and regulatory alignment. The study explores challenges related to digital skills, infrastructure, policy clarity, and stakeholder engagement, highlighting areas that require targeted interventions. Based on the findings, the study recommends capacity-building programs to improve digital proficiency among public officials, investment in infrastructure to support VE platforms, and policy frameworks to standardize and institutionalize VE across government departments. By addressing these challenges, public institutions can enhance the effectiveness of M&E practices and leverage digital innovations for improved governance. This study contributes to the evolving discourse on digital transformation in M&E, offering practical insights for policymakers, evaluators, and researchers working to advance evidence-based decision-making in South Africa's public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesedi Senamele Matlala, 2025. "E-governance in South Africa: barriers and enablers of virtual evaluation in the public sector," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(2), pages 84-108, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:84-108
    DOI: 10.70132/d9854558432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/uploads/articles/26/Matlala_Egovernance_in_South_Africa_barriers_and_enablers_of_virtual_evaluation_in_the_public_sector.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/article/197
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.70132/d9854558432?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    virtual evaluation; public sector evaluation; digital transformation; Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E); South Africa; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); institutional theory; evaluation capacity-building; policy innovation; e-governance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:84-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.