IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jmef00/v2y2016i2p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Essay on the Subjective Valuation of an Incentive System in an Insurance Market

Author

Listed:
  • Okura Mahito

    (Department of Social System Studies Faculty of Contemporary Social Studies Doshisha Women s College of Liberal Arts)

  • Nozaki Hiroyuki

    (Financial Technology Solution Division Nomura Research Institute Ltd)

Abstract

This study discusses two discount systems namely the insurance pre mium discount system where the policyholder s valuation is objective and the book price discount system where the policyholder s valuation is subjective The main pur pose of this study is to compare these discount systems and show the conditions under which each discount system is chosen by an insurance firm The main conclusions of this study are as follows First the insurance firm chooses the book price discount insurance premium discount system if the policyholder s disutility of loss prevention effort is relatively high low Second the insurance firm chooses the book price discount system when the initial wealth and maximum subjec tive valuation of the book price discount are large The insurance firm also chooses the book price discount system when the insurance premium the amount of damage and effect of the loss prevention effort are small

Suggested Citation

  • Okura Mahito & Nozaki Hiroyuki, 2016. "An Essay on the Subjective Valuation of an Incentive System in an Insurance Market," Journal of Mathematical Economics and Finance, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 7-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:srs:jmef00:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:7-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jmef00:v:2:y:2016:i:2:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jmef .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.