IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jemt00/v8y2017i3p497-506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Methodical Approaches to Environmental Risk Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Elena VOLKOVA

    (Business Informatics and Mathematics Tyumen Industrial University Russian Federation)

  • Evgeny KUZMIN

    (Corporate Economics Ural State University of Economics Russian Federation Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Federation)

Abstract

Environmental risks their assessment and risk management techniques make a range of relevant research in the field of environmental protection The extent of prior research on the problem does not underplay importance of a regular review of accents of the problem and approach improvements The article makes more specific the content of such concepts as the environmental safety and compliance and the environmental risk It also presents threat development factors related to a change in the environment Procedures to risk assessment for the environment exposed to pollutants are also presented Piloted approaches make it possible to make a conclusion of procedures quality causes for differences between level values of the risk depending on a research object To develop the integrated concept constituent components of the environment as homogeneous subsystems are discussed The article provides the algorithm for the environmental risk analysis Findings precondition the environmental risk management strategy focused on a systemic effect of regulatory measures

Suggested Citation

  • Elena VOLKOVA & Evgeny KUZMIN, 2017. "Comparison of Methodical Approaches to Environmental Risk Assessment," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(3), pages 497-506.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:497-506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:3:p:497-506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.