IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jemt00/v8y2017i2p467-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnic Cultural Tourism Resources Evaluation and Development Kazakh Cultural Tourism Resources Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Adayi SAIKEN

    (L N Gumilyev Eurasian National University Kazakhstan)

  • Yang ZHAOPING

    (Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Science China)

  • Ordenbek MAZBAYEV

    (L N Gumilyev Eurasian National University Kazakhstan)

  • Azamat DUISSEMBAYEV

    (L N Gumilyev Eurasian National University Kazakhstan)

  • Beknur IZENBAEV

    (L N Gumilyev Eurasian National University Kazakhstan)

  • Samalgul NASSANBEKOVA

    (L N Gumilyev Eurasian National University Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Evaluation of tourism resources of national culture requires effective development of ethnic cultural tourism resources and identification of the development of the main body as well as provision of a scientific basis for decision making At the present commonly used practice of tourism development methods in our country are qualitative evaluation and quantitative evaluation In most cases those methods are only applicable for the natural tourism resources but that is not a perfect assessment method for ethnic cultural tourism resources Based on the results of previous studies this article attempts to use a new method on tourism resources evaluation of Kazakh ethnic cultural resources whereby mainly adopts qualitative index and quantitative index from the fuzzy evaluation method The method of qualitative evaluation is often based on the expert s wealthy experience and knowledge and their results are always partial to decision making demand of the expert Therefore their evaluation results belong to the kind of subjective evaluation Quantitative evaluation method is trying to make the resources assessment more objective and accurate but the evaluation of the impact of the subjective factors is unavoidable To reduce the influence of human factor for the evaluation the result has to suit achievable measures which adjust measures to local conditions on index extraction method selection and model building and to make every effort to correspond to reality to be objective and to be accurate evaluation A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is a kind of fuzzy reasoning based on the combination of qualitative and quantitative exact and inexact unified evaluation method This kind of method in cultural tourism resources evaluation has good theoretical guidance and practical operation

Suggested Citation

  • Adayi SAIKEN & Yang ZHAOPING & Ordenbek MAZBAYEV & Azamat DUISSEMBAYEV & Beknur IZENBAEV & Samalgul NASSANBEKOVA, 2017. "Ethnic Cultural Tourism Resources Evaluation and Development Kazakh Cultural Tourism Resources Analysis," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(2), pages 467-475.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:467-475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. José Álvarez-García & Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & María de la Cruz Del Río-Rama & Francisco Javier Castellano-Álvarez, 2019. "Cultural Heritage and Tourism Basis for Regional Development: Mapping of Scientific Coverage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:467-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.