IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jemt00/v8y2017i1p31-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversified Approach to Quantification of Risks that Arise in Projects Associated with Extraction of Hydrocarbon Resources in the Arctic

Author

Listed:
  • Mihail DUDIN

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration RANEPA Russian Federation)

  • Nikolay LYASNIKOV

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration RANEPA Russian Federation)

  • Evgeniy KATUL'SKIY

    (Institute of Labour FGBU Russian Federation)

  • Dorina SHHIPANOVA

    (FNO VPO Moscow University for the Humanities Russian Federation)

  • Andrey CHEKANOV

    (Legal and Documentary Software Secretariat of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union of Belarus and Russia Russian Federation)

Abstract

Intensification of oil and gas extraction in the Arctic and a consequent growth of the volume of transported oil increase the likelihood of occurrence of various risk events The companies engaged in extraction of hydrocarbons in the Arctic territory face the need to assess numerous risks Quantification of information about risks is determined by the need to obtain numerical data that would allow carrying out a prospective economic analysis of exploration activities in the Arctic territory The article presents a method of quantification of risks the use of which allows translating the linguistic characteristic of any harmful event into measured categories This method found its actual use in the assessment of three groups of risk asset security risks environmental risks and reliability risks associated with the companies production activity on extraction of hydrocarbons in the Arctic The following conclusions were obtained following the results of presentation of the materials in the article hydrocarbon reserves in the Arctic shelf determine the growth of corporate and state interests in their commercial development However extraction of hydrocarbon resources in the Arctic at the same time a priori carries a high level of risks associated with the climatic features of the region the fragility of its ecosystem and the need to develop and consequently use special equipment and technology as a rule Russian companies that implement Arctic projects assess the risks of these projects linguistically and empirically without conducting their quantitative or monetary estimate This is why the problem of quantification of risks of Arctic projects is the most urgent today and requires the development of new methodological approaches this article presents and partially tests the method of quantification of risks of Arctic projects by the example of the Novoportovskoye field and extraction of hydrocarbons using the offshore ice resistant fixed platform Prirazlomnaya The assessment findings show that the risks of these projects do not exceed average values publication of quantified information about risks of ongoing Arctic projects in the official reports of the Russian companies will ensure the transparency of their operations and increase the level of their social and environmental responsibility to society

Suggested Citation

  • Mihail DUDIN & Nikolay LYASNIKOV & Evgeniy KATUL'SKIY & Dorina SHHIPANOVA & Andrey CHEKANOV, 2017. "Diversified Approach to Quantification of Risks that Arise in Projects Associated with Extraction of Hydrocarbon Resources in the Arctic," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 31-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:31-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:31-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.