IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jemt00/v3y2012i2p59-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theoretical Study Between The Two Environmental Management Systems Eco Management Audit Scheme Emas And Iso 14000

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina BARBU

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Mihail NEGULESCU

    (Spiru Haret University)

  • Irina BARBU

    (University of Bucharest Major Communication and Public Relations)

Abstract

The concept of an environmental management system evolved in the early nineties An environmental management system exists to help organizations minimize how their operations processes etc negatively affect the environment i e cause adverse changes to air water or land comply with applicable laws regulations and other environmentally oriented requirements and continually improve in the above An environmental management system can also manage natural resources and improve the reliability and credibility of the environmental policies At the European level we have EMAS The Eco Management and Audit Scheme EMAS is the EU s voluntary scheme designed for companies and other organisations committing themselves to evaluate manage and improve their environmental performance This was introduced by a European Union council regulation No 1836 29 06 1993 requiring implementation in all European Union Member States EMAS was formally introduced in the United Kingdom in April 1995 ISO 14000 is an International Standard 1996 Applicable on an international scale This paper aims to make a theoretical comparison between these two environmental management systems

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina BARBU & Mihail NEGULESCU & Irina BARBU, 2012. "A Theoretical Study Between The Two Environmental Management Systems Eco Management Audit Scheme Emas And Iso 14000," Journal of Advanced Research in Management, ASERS Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 59-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:59-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jemt00:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:59-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jemt .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.