IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v9y2018i1p333-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forensic Examination as the Main Form of Using Special Knowledge in the Civil and Arbitration Process

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey VORONIN

    (Department of Civil and Arbitration Process People s Friendship University of Russia RUDN University Moscow RussianFederation)

Abstract

Considering the classification of forensic examinations it is necessary to consider the classification task of a General theory of judicial examination of common problems and practical forensic activities This article reveals the full extent of the use of special knowledge from the expert during the examination in civil and arbitration process Deals with the practical tasks of forensic activities problems of the theory examination and the classification of expert tasks in the civil and arbitration process It is interesting to consider another classification of expert tasks the level of elaboration of methods of their solution On this basis the tasks are divided into standard algorithmization and custom heuristic creative Algorithmically the process of solving standard tasks are presented in the form of a developed and scientifically based techniques of expert research facilities techniques of forensic examinations It is interesting to consider another classification of expert tasks the level of elaboration of methods of their solution On this basis the tasks are divided into standard algorithmization and custom heuristic creative Algorithmically the process of solving standard tasks are presented in the form of a developed and scientifically based techniques of expert research facilities techniques of forensic examinations

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey VORONIN, 2018. "Forensic Examination as the Main Form of Using Special Knowledge in the Civil and Arbitration Process," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 333-341.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:333-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:333-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.