IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i7p2103-2111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controversy in Deprivation of Citizenship on Charges of Terrorism and Separatism

Author

Listed:
  • Bogdan DEREVYANKO

    (Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Kryvyi Rih Ukraine)

  • Evgeniy ZOZULYA

    (Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Kryvyi Rih Ukraine)

Abstract

The manuscript deals with the issues of reasonability of involuntary loss of citizenship of Ukraine and presentation of conclusions to the public including politicians and legislators Research was conducted using normative sociological approaches methods of induction and deduction analysis and synthesis comparison and contrast to compare the penalty of deprivation of citizenship allegiance in modern world with the exile from tribe at the time of primitive society and from the state in ancient times the manuscript provides a list of benefits and privileges with focus on civil political social economic humanitarian rights and freedoms of the citizens of Ukraine which accordingly may be lost in the event of involuntary loss of citizenship of terrorism and separatism suspects Such measure would have a serious effect of punishment if the state guaranteed fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens of Ukraine to the extent defined by internationally recognized standards significant economic benefits for the citizens of Ukraine or inability to obtain citizenship of another state Conclusion was made about the inexpediency of introduction of such penalties at the current stage of development of the economy and civil society in Ukraine

Suggested Citation

  • Bogdan DEREVYANKO & Evgeniy ZOZULYA, 2017. "Controversy in Deprivation of Citizenship on Charges of Terrorism and Separatism," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(7), pages 2103-2111.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:7:p:2103-2111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:7:p:2103-2111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.