IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i5p1641-1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Instruments and the Trend towards the Harmonization of Proprietary Regulation in the Civil Law of Member States of BRICS

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander ZELENTSOV

    (P ples Friendship University of Russia RUDN University Moscow Russian Federation)

  • Vladimira DOLINSKAYA

    (Kutafin Moscow State Law University MSAL Moscow Russian Federation)

  • vgenia FROLOVA

    (P ples Friendship University of Russia RUDN University Moscow Russian Federation)

  • Petr KUCHERENKO

    (P ples Friendship University of Russia RUDN University Moscow Russian Federation)

  • Mihail DUDIN

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration RANEPA Moscow Russian Federation)

Abstract

The current changes confirm the hypothesis that future economic transformations as well as social and political interaction will change their direction and that the American European dominance will be minimized by the active development of the Eurasian and Asia Africa region In the medium term the BRICS countries Brazil Russia India China and South Africa will largely determine the world s political and economic agenda Therefore issues related to the study of the principles of civil law of the BRICS countries are becoming more and more relevant The purpose of the article is formulated the following way an analysis of the characteristics of the national regulation of proprietary rights reveals the specifics of the intercultural conflicts of the investigated area the elimination of which will lead to the harmonization of the legislation of the considered countries which will accelerate socio political and economic technological interactions between the BRICS countries and will provide them with the best competitive position in the world economy The proposed article using a comparative analysis of the basic rules of the proprietary law of the five BRICS countries and using open economic statistical legal and regulatory data posted on the Internet presented the structural and logical frameworks describing the key approaches of national legislation systems in this area of legal relations On the basis of the data it was concluded that the proprietary law of the BRICS countries should be harmonized for the following main reasons 1 the existence of cross legal conflicts makes it possible to define the framework boundaries of harmonization of proprietary law in the five BRICS countries 2 the existing loopholes and gaps in national legislation are sources of legal innovation and motives for the development of an institutional interstate environment within the BRICS Thus on the one hand the article is analytical aimed at the review of the existing features of national regulation of proprietary rights in the BRICS countries On the other hand the article suggests a number of practical steps that need to be taken in order to harmonize the national legislation of the BRICS countries

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander ZELENTSOV & Vladimira DOLINSKAYA & vgenia FROLOVA & Petr KUCHERENKO & Mihail DUDIN, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Instruments and the Trend towards the Harmonization of Proprietary Regulation in the Civil Law of Member States of BRICS," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 1641-1649.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:1641-1649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:1641-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.