IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i5p1563-1575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limits of Analogy in the Mechanism of Judicial Reduction of Property Sanctions

Author

Listed:
  • Viktor MIKRYUKOV

    (Kutafin Moscow State Law University MSAL Moscow Russia)

Abstract

The relevance of this study is due to modern lawyers and law enforcement officials increased attention to the problems of using the analogy method in practical jurisprudence the acute need to search for scientifically substantiated parameters of using this method in the mechanism of property sanctions judicial reduction The role of the analogy method in the mechanism of judicial adjustment of property sanctions amount is clarified and legal limits of its application are established The methods used analysis synthesis abstraction specification comparative legal formal legal and technical legal The study shows the formation of a positive attitude of lawyers to the institution of judicial control over the property sanctions amount justification for civil violations and other compensatory payments to participants in the economic transactions The findings can contribute to the doctrinal foundations strengthening for applying the analogy of law and the analogy of justice Recommendations for the current legislation improving and application are formulated For prevention of extrajudicial situational blocking of the formally lawful but undesirable economic behavior using of specially created legislative tools is proposed and in their absence resorting to the principle of inadmissibility of abusing the law

Suggested Citation

  • Viktor MIKRYUKOV, 2017. "Limits of Analogy in the Mechanism of Judicial Reduction of Property Sanctions," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(5), pages 1563-1575.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:1563-1575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:1563-1575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.