IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v8y2017i4(26)p1175-1184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cutting Administrative Barriers in Construction What is the Actual Economic Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel KOSTRIKIN

    (Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Moscow Russian Federation)

Abstract

Far reaching bureaucracy naturally creates administrative barriers to business including construction business This aggravates the business climate and decelerates the pace of urban development which results in the public not having access to the necessary social infrastructure This study explores the cutting of administrative barriers in house construction by the example of Moscow a city with a transformation economy A set of complementary research methods was used to achieve the set goals government decree monitoring comparative analysis and the economic statistical method In order to eliminate excess administrative barriers in house construction the government of the Russian Federation in 2014 approved an exhaustive list of administrative procedures in house construction starting with the participation of the developer in the auction of the right to enter into a lease agreement for the land plot and ending with the state registration of the right of ownership to the object According to government officials the measures that were taken had to significantly cut the expenses borne by investors and the terms of implementation of construction projects However in spite of the reduced duration of administrative procedures the set of reforms turned out to be piecemeal

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel KOSTRIKIN, 2017. "Cutting Administrative Barriers in Construction What is the Actual Economic Effect," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 8(4(26)), pages 1175-1184.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:4(26):p:1175-1184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:8:y:2017:i:4(26):p:1175-1184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.