IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v7y2016i4p920-925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adversarial Principle and Principle of Equality of Arms as a Subject of Adversarial Type of Criminal Proceeding

Author

Listed:
  • Gakharman Sanan Ogly SADIEV

    (Law Department Institute of Philosophy and Political and Legal Researches National Academy of Science of the Kyrgyz Republic)

Abstract

The article concerns adversarial principle and principle of equality of arms as a subject of adversarial type of criminal proceedings Adversariality being complex legal phenomenon also has its structure and system of features that includes 1 functions of prosecution defense and resolution of criminal cases are separated from each other and cannot be imposed on the same authority or the same official 2 court is not an authority of persecution it acts neither on the part of prosecution nor on the part of defense Court provides necessary conditions for parties execution of their procedural obligations and exercise of their granted rights The prosecution and the defense are of equal rights to the court The subject matter of adversarial system implies presence of equal parties separation of main procedural functions presence of impartial arbitrator the court that is aimed at resolution of procedural conflicts of parties Exclusion of any of denoted elements would not only make the subject of considered principle incomplete but also put in question the very possibility of its existence So modern criminal court is an active participator of proving procedure in all its aspects playing operational and control role in the present sphere of criminal procedural activity

Suggested Citation

  • Gakharman Sanan Ogly SADIEV, 2016. "Adversarial Principle and Principle of Equality of Arms as a Subject of Adversarial Type of Criminal Proceeding," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 920-925.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:920-925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:920-925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.