IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v7y2016i4p788-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Legal Support of Employee of Employee Shared Ownership in Modern Russia Regions Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Ivanovna GABDULHAKOVA

    (Naberezhnochelninsky Institute of KFU Naberezhnye Chelny)

  • Olga Vladimirovna NEKRASOVA

    (Naberezhnochelninsky Institute of KFU Naberezhnye Chelny)

Abstract

Currently in Russia a great part of capital is steadily formed in a small number of people Unfortunately this model of capital concentration cannot be considered effective nor called socially equitable for the majority of the population The difficult state of domestic production in all regions of the country the negative impact of general political developments in the world and other factors contribute neither to the increase in the productivity of enterprises nor to the increase in the employee s interest to improve the profitability of enterprises nor to the growth of the Russian economy as a whole It is therefore necessary to consider alternative ways of development of the modern economy to raise the interest of each employee not only the owner shareholder or senior management of enterprises in the end result of their activity In our opinion an alternative form of society capitalization is the development of employee shared ownership This experience is especially prevalent today in many countries with successful economies In Russia this ownership exists in the form of a few public enterprises employee owned closed joint stock companies This paper considers the question of the attitude of the country s regions to the functioning and dissemination of the experience of enterprises with employee stock ownership in the current Russian economic reality

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Ivanovna GABDULHAKOVA & Olga Vladimirovna NEKRASOVA, 2016. "Economic and Legal Support of Employee of Employee Shared Ownership in Modern Russia Regions Opinion," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 788-796.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:788-796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:788-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.