IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v7y2016i1p64-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Jurisdiction of Individual Labour Disputes in the Republic of Kazakhstan Comparative Legal Analysis of the Labour Law Application in Countries Near and Far Abroad

Author

Listed:
  • Guzal Gazinurovna GALIAKBAROVA
  • Svetlana Bakhytovna ZHARKENOVA
  • Lyazzat Shalbaevna KULMAKHANOVA

Abstract

Background Objectives This article deals with the specifics of jurisdiction of individual labor disputes in the Republic of Kazakhstan sharing also experience of certain European countries Switzerland France Italy Sweden and CIS states Ukraine Belarus The authors point out shortcomings of this issue that have been discovered in the latest Labor Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan Ways of improving legal regulation of the procedure for resolving individual labor disputes in Kazakhstan are proposed based on foreign practice studies The relevance of this matter is dictated by the fact that at the moment Methods Currently legal regulation of individual labor disputes in Kazakhstan is a key matter of legal labor relations Such scientific methods as scientific research comparative analysis and generalization were used in the course of this research Foreign and domestic sources were used for this research and a list of such resources can be found in the References section Findings According to the analysis of the Kazakh and Russian procedural legislation there is a steady trend towards expanding ways of resolving legal disputes in court in general labor disputes in particular including those between economic operators an employee and the employer which appears to correspond to the current development of economic relations Hence there is an increasing role of specialized labor courts which may play an important role in Kazakhstan as well in matters of correct and exhaustive resolution of labor disputes on the whole and individual disputes in particular provided the experience of certain EC states is used and introduced correctly Application Improvements The authors conclude that it is necessary to study an institute of individual labor disputes at the current stage of the society and state development as long as such institution regulates one of the most important and integral part of legal procedural labor relations Therewith reasonable application and awareness of standards of such institution shall prevent any abuse on the part of the employer and an employee The authors justified their conclusion on the applicability of experience of certain European countries with labor courts and labor justices functioning there to introduce the experience of certain foreign countries in the use of a simplified procedure of resolution of labor disputes aiming at accelerated resolution of such disputes and reducing the load on such courts significantly

Suggested Citation

  • Guzal Gazinurovna GALIAKBAROVA & Svetlana Bakhytovna ZHARKENOVA & Lyazzat Shalbaevna KULMAKHANOVA, 2016. "Revisiting Jurisdiction of Individual Labour Disputes in the Republic of Kazakhstan Comparative Legal Analysis of the Labour Law Application in Countries Near and Far Abroad," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 64-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:64-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:64-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.