IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/srs/jarle0/v2y2011i4p125-135.html

On The Deterrent Effect Of Individual Versus Collective Liability In Criminal Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Laetitia HAURET

    (Centre d Etudes de Populations de Pauvret et de Politiques Socio Economiques International Network for Studies in Technology Environment Alternatives Development Differdange Luxembourg)

  • Eric LANGLAIS

    (Nancy University EconomiX and CEREFIGE France)

  • Carine SONNTAG

    (ICN Business School Nancy France)

Abstract

Our paper addresses the question of the deterrent effect of a monetary sanction associated to a collective rather than an individual liability when crimes are realized within a hierarchical gang defined as a criminal organization where the leader is a sleeping partner and several agents are active partners in the illegal or criminal activity We develop a model where the active gang members face contradictory incentives to commit a crime On the one hand public authorities try to deter each gang member by imposing sanctions on the second the leader of the gang try to keep his members enough active in the gang by threatening them of private sanctions We show that sanctions based on individual liability are inefficient to deter gang s members since the leader overreacts on the public sanctions In contrast we show that a regime of collective liability allowing the judge to sanction the sleeping partner even if he hasn t realized any crime himself can reach enough deterrence of the members of the gang

Suggested Citation

  • Laetitia HAURET & Eric LANGLAIS & Carine SONNTAG, 2011. "On The Deterrent Effect Of Individual Versus Collective Liability In Criminal Organizations," Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, ASERS Publishing, vol. 2(4), pages 125-135.
  • Handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:125-135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K0 - Law and Economics - - General
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:srs:jarle0:v:2:y:2011:i:4:p:125-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Popirlan The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Claudiu Popirlan to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.