IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/src/relatj/v3y2021i1p47-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Conflict Management Styles of University Teachers at Post-graduate Level: The Impact of Gender and Marital Status

Author

Listed:
  • Batool, Tahira
  • Umm e Habiba
  • Ayesha, Sayeda

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify the conflict management styles of Pakistani teachers teaching at the post-graduate level. The study also aimed to investigate differences, if any, between male and female as well as married and un-married teachers regarding the use of conflict management styles. The sample of the study consisted of 300 male and female teachers from five public universities of Lahore district.We found that collaborating conflict management style is used most frequently by teachers who participated in this study. In this regard, the majority of teachers were found to use the avoiding technique “keep yourself away from conflict” to resolve the conflict. There was a significant difference between married and un-married teachers regarding their competing and compromising conflict management styles. However, no significant difference was found between male and female teachers regarding their conflict management styles. More research may be conducted in academic institutions regarding conflict management skills among teachers. The study suggested that educational institutions may also formulate their teams of expert teachers, which may work effectively during the times of conflicts or crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Batool, Tahira & Umm e Habiba & Ayesha, Sayeda, 2021. "Study of Conflict Management Styles of University Teachers at Post-graduate Level: The Impact of Gender and Marital Status," Responsible Education, Learning and Teaching in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 3(1), pages 47-55, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:src:relatj:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:47-55
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/relate.v3i1.1791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/relate/article/view/1791/1177
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.26710/relate.v3i1.1791?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:relatj:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:47-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Ghulam Fatima (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.