IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/src/jafeec/v8y2022i1p33-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Convexity in the Flow-Performance Relationship: A Study of Pakistani Mutual Funds

Author

Listed:
  • Khan, Saleh Nawaz
  • Iqbal, Javed
  • Amin, Shahid
  • Rafique, Atif

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to study the potential sources of convexity in the flow-performance relationship curve in the Asian region.Design/Methodology/Approach: The sample for this study includes 75 mutual funds from three broader investment categories: stock funds, balanced funds, and asset allocation funds. The data is collected from the financial reports of the respective funds from 2011 to 2020. The study employs the ordinary least square method on unbalanced panel data.&Findings: The findings show that the fund flows are positively associated with fund performance in the Pakistani mutual fund market. The result also confirmed that the shape of the relationship is convex. The fund size and marketing expenditures are positively associated with convexity. However, fund age does not affect the convexity. The Result also confirmed that fund rating is not an appropriate proxy for fund size.Practical Implication- In period of low performance mutual fund management can retain their investors by increasing their marketing expenditures and fund size.Originality/Value: This paper fulfills an identified need to study the sources behind non-linear flow-performance relationship curve in the Asian region. This study also aims to resolve the conflict in literature relating to the fund size on the convexity of the flow performance relationship. &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Suggested Citation

  • Khan, Saleh Nawaz & Iqbal, Javed & Amin, Shahid & Rafique, Atif, 2022. "Determinants of Convexity in the Flow-Performance Relationship: A Study of Pakistani Mutual Funds," Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 8(1), pages 33-44, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:src:jafeec:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:33-44
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v8i1.2162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/2162/1341
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v8i1.2162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:jafeec:v:8:y:2022:i:1:p:33-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rabia Rasheed (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.