IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/src/jafeec/v12y2026i1p323-334.html

AI-Driven Financial Statement Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study with Explainable AI Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Maqbool, Zoha

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this study is to examine whether machine learning classifiers can outperform traditional rule-based statistical fraud detection techniques on valid data, and whether explainable AI can counter the black-box issue.Design/Methodology/Approach: Four Machine Learning (ML) classifiers, including Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, Random Forest, and MLP, were evaluated against four traditional benchmark models using 742 company year-end observations from the SEC EDGAR database (2019-2023), which were labelled based on SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. LIME was applied to make the AI results explainable, and then it was cross validated against forensic accounting indicators.Findings: Gradient Boosting and XGBoost each achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.90, while all traditional results fell below 0.54. LIME explanations consistently identified high leverage, negative ROA and lower liquidity as signs of fraud.Implications/Originality/Value: The findings in this study have direct implications for emerging markets, especially Pakistan’s SECP, as enforcement capacity is limited. A thought on the integration of blockchain is given conceptually, and a framework is proposed. A deployed web application (EMZE) demonstrates pipeline accessibility for non-specialist users.

Suggested Citation

  • Maqbool, Zoha, 2026. "AI-Driven Financial Statement Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study with Explainable AI Integration," Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 12(1), pages 323-334, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:src:jafeec:v:12:y:2026:i:1:p:323-334
    DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v12i1.3773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publishing.globalcsrc.org/ojs/index.php/jafee/article/view/3773/2040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v12i1.3773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:jafeec:v:12:y:2026:i:1:p:323-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rabia Rasheed (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.