Author
Abstract
Purpose: Australian electricity networks face growing exposure to extreme weather, including catastrophic bushfires, tropical cyclones, and severe storms, that stresses the National Electricity Market (NEM) well beyond the scope of conventional reliability regulation. This paper examines how electricity network resilience is, and might better be, measured in Australia. It distinguishes resilience from routine reliability, as captured by the System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI) and System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI).Approach: Applies a statistical analysis to the latest data published by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) and Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). Using 2024 national distribution network data, the analysis quantifies a reliability–resilience gap of approximately 70.8 percent of total outage minutes and 37.5 percent of total interruptions that fall outside normalized reliability reporting. Case analyses of the 2019–20 Black Summer bushfires and the March 2025 Ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred, Queensland's largest natural-disaster outage event on record, illustrate the scale of extreme-event impact. The paper further examines the Australian Energy Market Commission's May 2025 rule change embedding a formal distribution network resilience framework in the National Electricity Rules, together with cost pass-through data and Victorian resilience capital expenditure, as emerging indicators of a nationally consistent resilience metric.Findings: The findings indicate that Australia's reliability-incentive architecture, while effective for routine performance, systematically understates the customer-facing burden of extreme events, and that new regulatory reforms are beginning to close this measurement gap.
Suggested Citation
Aslam, Sumera, 2025.
"Measuring Electricity Network Resilience in Australia: A Statistical Analysis of Current Regulatory and Extreme-Event Data,"
Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies, CSRC Publishing, Center for Sustainability Research and Consultancy Pakistan, vol. 11(4), pages 639-648, December.
Handle:
RePEc:src:jafeec:v:11:y:2025:i:4:p:639-648
DOI: http://doi.org/10.26710/jafee.v11i4.3840
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:src:jafeec:v:11:y:2025:i:4:p:639-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rabia Rasheed (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrcmpk.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.