IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/rmkjrc/v4y2017i1f.html

VIX Index and Stock Returns Following Large Price Moves

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Kudryavtsev

Abstract

My study explores the effect of future volatility expectations, embedded in VIX index, on large daily stock price changes and on subsequent stock returns. Following both psychological and financial literature claiming that good (bad) mood may cause people to perceive positive (negative) future outcomes as more probable and that the changes in the value of VIX may be negatively correlated with contemporaneous investors’ mood, I hypothesize that if a major positive (negative) stock price move takes place on a day when the value of VIX falls (rises), then its magnitude may be amplified by positive (negative) investors' mood, creating price overreaction to the initial company-specific shock, which may result in subsequent price reversal. In line with my hypothesis, I document that both positive and negative large price moves accompanied by the opposite-sign contemporaneous changes in VIX are followed by significant reversals on the next two trading days and over five- and twenty-day intervals following the event, the magnitude of the reversals increasing over longer post-event windows, while large stock price changes taking place on the days when the value of VIX moves in the same direction are followed by non-significant price drifts. The results remain robust after accounting for additional company (size, beta, historical volatility) and event-specific (stock's return and trading volume on the event day) factors, and are stronger for small and volatile stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Kudryavtsev, 2017. "VIX Index and Stock Returns Following Large Price Moves," Journal of Risk & Control, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 4(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:rmkjrc:v:4:y:2017:i:1:f:
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JRC%2fJRC%204_1_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benoit Mandelbrot, 1963. "New Methods in Statistical Economics," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 71(5), pages 421-421.
    2. Bauer, Christian, 2000. "Value at risk using hyperbolic distributions," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 455-467.
    3. Hansen, Bruce E, 1994. "Autoregressive Conditional Density Estimation," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 35(3), pages 705-730, August.
    4. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    5. Lesedi Mabitsela & Eben Maré & Rodwell Kufakunesu, 2015. "Quantification of VaR: A Note on VaR Valuation in the South African Equity Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Virginie Konlack Socgnia & Diane Wilcox, 2014. "A Comparison of Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution Models for Equity Returns," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
    7. Virginie Konlack Socgnia & Diane Wilcox, 2014. "A Comparison of Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution Models for Equity Returns," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-15, June.
    8. Guo, Zi-Yi, 2017. "Empirical Performance of GARCH Models with Heavy-tailed Innovations," EconStor Preprints 167626, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zi-Yi Guo, 2017. "Heavy-tailed Distributions and Risk Management of Equity Market Tail Events," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 31-41.
    2. BenSaïda, Ahmed & Slim, Skander, 2016. "Highly flexible distributions to fit multiple frequency financial returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 442(C), pages 203-213.
    3. Ñíguez, Trino-Manuel & Perote, Javier, 2017. "Moments expansion densities for quantifying financial risk," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 53-69.
    4. Henri Bertholon & Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro, 2006. "Pricing and Inference with Mixtures of Conditionally Normal Processes," Working Papers 2006-28, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    5. Enrique Calder'in-Ojeda & Yuyu Chen & Soon Wei Tan, 2026. "Capital allocation and tail central moments for the multivariate normal mean-variance mixture distribution," Papers 2601.00568, arXiv.org.
    6. Tiantian Li & Young Shin Kim & Qi Fan & Fumin Zhu, 2021. "Aumann–Serrano index of risk in portfolio optimization," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(2), pages 197-217, October.
    7. Anand, Abhinav & Li, Tiantian & Kurosaki, Tetsuo & Kim, Young Shin, 2016. "Foster–Hart optimal portfolios," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 117-130.
    8. Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2019. "Capturing deep tail risk via sequential learning of quantile dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Leovardo Mata Mata & José Antonio Núñez Mora & Ramona Serrano Bautista, 2021. "Multivariate Distribution in the Stock Markets of Brazil, Russia, India, and China," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    10. Lin, Chu-Hsiung & Changchien, Chang-Cheng & Kao, Tzu-Chuan & Kao, Wei-Shun, 2014. "High-order moments and extreme value approach for value-at-risk," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 421-434.
    11. Koliai, Lyes, 2016. "Extreme risk modeling: An EVT–pair-copulas approach for financial stress tests," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-22.
    12. George Karathanassis & Vasilios Sogiakas, 2010. "Spill over effects of futures contracts initiation on the cash market: a regime shift approach," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 95-143, January.
    13. Kengo Kayaba & Yui Hirano & Naoki Ueda & Nobuki Matsui, 2018. "An investigation of fat-tailed distributions in fitting the Japanese stock market returns," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1399-1399.
    14. Andreas Behr & Ulrich Pötter, 2009. "Alternatives to the normal model of stock returns: Gaussian mixture, generalised logF and generalised hyperbolic models," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 49-68, January.
    15. Jianhua Ding & Turen Guo & Bin Guo, 2018. "Fat Tails, Value at Risk, and the Palladium Returns," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 7(2), pages 95-103, May.
    16. Yun Xiang & Shijie Deng, 2025. "Long-range dependence and asset return anomaly," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 369-391, March.
    17. Michael Day & Mark Diamond & Jeff Card & Jake Hurd & Jianping Xu, 2017. "GARCH model and fat tails of the Chinese stock market returns - New evidences," Journal of Risk & Control, Risk Market Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 43-49.
    18. Benjamin R. Auer & Benjamin Mögel, 2016. "How Accurate are Modern Value-at-Risk Estimators Derived from Extreme Value Theory?," CESifo Working Paper Series 6288, CESifo.
    19. Borkowski, Bolesław & Krawiec, Monika & Shachmurove, Yochanan, 2013. "Impact of volatility estimation method on theoretical option values," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 119-128.
    20. Wang, Yudong & Liu, Li & Ma, Feng & Wu, Chongfeng, 2016. "What the investors need to know about forecasting oil futures return volatility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 128-139.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:rmkjrc:v:4:y:2017:i:1:f:. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.