IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/fininv/v2y2013i4f2_4_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Historical and Implied Volatility Estimates in Efficient Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac J. Faber

Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of efficient portfolios with differing sources of volatility estimation. One of the primary assumptions of modern portfolio theory is that the parameters, asset means, standard deviations and covariance, are known. In practice these values are not known and have to be derived from reliable and accurate sources. Two sources of volatility estimation are compared in this paper; the classical statistical approach and Black-Sholes implied volatility. The time horizon preceding, during and after the financial crisis of 2008-9 is used to evaluate the two sources of information by generating competing monthly tangency portfolios. The results suggest that while historical statistical estimates outperform there is no statistically significant difference between the two over the given time horizon. However, this is partially due to there being a tendency for implied volatility to remain over inflated beyond the crisis into the recovery period. This then leads to significant losses in portfolios that solely use the implied volatility measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac J. Faber, 2013. "Comparing Historical and Implied Volatility Estimates in Efficient Portfolios," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 2(4), pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:fininv:v:2:y:2013:i:4:f:2_4_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JFIA%2fVol%202_4_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:fininv:v:2:y:2013:i:4:f:2_4_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.