IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/apfiba/v1y2011i1f1_1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Activity Based Costing (ABC) is still tagging behind the traditional costing in Malaysia?

Author

Listed:
  • Devinaga Rasiah

Abstract

Abstact This study compares activity-based costing (ABC) model and traditional costing method in Malaysia. Activity based costing (ABC) which was developed into the manufacturing/service sectors in Malaysia. It calculates the cost and performance of activities, resources and cost objects. It can be considered as an alternative model to Traditional Cost-based accounting systems. In this study the results indicated that most operations managers believed that their present cost systems were adequate for decision making. In certain circumstances, operations managers evaluated their cost systems as more effective than those using other cost systems. Activity-based costing systems were evaluated as somewhat more useful, but no relevant literature was found to indicate that either the external or internal environment of the firm was correlated with the choice of cost system.

Suggested Citation

  • Devinaga Rasiah, 2011. "Why Activity Based Costing (ABC) is still tagging behind the traditional costing in Malaysia?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 1-4.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:1:y:2011:i:1:f:1_1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB%2fVol%201_1_4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abedalqader Rbaba’h, 2013. "The influence of Company Characteristics Factors to Activity Based Costing System Implementation," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 36-46.
    2. Tarzibashi Omar Fikrat Fateh & Ozyapici Hasan, 2019. "The Impact of the Magnitude of Overhead Costs on the Difference Between ABC and TDABC Systems," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 81-92, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:apfiba:v:1:y:2011:i:1:f:1_1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.