IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v3y2013i6f3_6_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chaos Detection in Economic Time Series: Metric versus Topological Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Marisa Faggini

Abstract

From an empirical point of view, it is difficult to distinguish between fluctuations provoked by random shocks and endogenous fluctuations determined by the nonlinear nature of the relation between economic aggregates. For this purpose, chaos tests are developed to investigate the chaotic phenomena of basic features: nonlinearity, fractal attractor, and sensitivity to initial conditions. The application of these tests to economic and financial time series produced controversial results. Investigators found substantial evidence for nonlinearity but relatively weak evidence for chaos per se. The aim of the paper is twofold. In the first place, to compare the different techniques with which to analyse chaotic time series highlighting their potentiality and limitations. Secondly, to apply in an empirical exercise a topological tool - Recurrence Analysis - using data already analysed with metric tests in order to show whether the result of this analysis could change if performed with tools more appropriate for discovering chaos in short and noisy time series.

Suggested Citation

  • Marisa Faggini, 2013. "Chaos Detection in Economic Time Series: Metric versus Topological Tools," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 3(6), pages 1-3.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:3:y:2013:i:6:f:3_6_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%203_6_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannis Andreadis & Athanasios D. Fragkou & Theodoros E. Karakasidis & Apostolos Serletis, 2023. "Nonlinear dynamics in Divisia monetary aggregates: an application of recurrence quantification analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:3:y:2013:i:6:f:3_6_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.