IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v12y2022i5f12_5_1.html

On Cryptocurrencies: An Assessment of Bitcoin’s Prospect As Legal Medium of Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Kazi Md. Nasir Uddin

Abstract

Digital currency has gained importance in recent times. But definitional issue made this currency ambiguous to society and financial institutes. Digital currencies are used in real-world transaction as well as in the dark web. Digital currency comes into discussion with the creation of bitcoin - an online payment method with no intermediary or financial institute. This online payment system has a strong security system. Consequently, bitcoin account holders has been increasing considerably. We can use bitcoins legally besides other legal tenders, if existing laws do not consider these coins immoral. Also, in the midst of the ongoing global pandemic (Novel Coronavirus or Covid-19), a paperless currency like bitcoin, which also involves contactless transaction, would go a long way in preserving wellbeing for individual and economy alike. Furthermore, we can try to find out and address the problems related to this currency. After proper assessment, if we acknowledge bitcoin, they can compete with the existing coins in the present currency system, complying with government rules, and contribute to the development of the currency system. They can also work as service providers or economic agents of virtual coins, and participate in the country’s economic activities through the exchange of the coins. JEL Classification: E42, G18, O38.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazi Md. Nasir Uddin, 2022. "On Cryptocurrencies: An Assessment of Bitcoin’s Prospect As Legal Medium of Exchange," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(5), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:12:y:2022:i:5:f:12_5_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%2012_5_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E42 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Monetary Systems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:12:y:2022:i:5:f:12_5_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.