IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v96y2016i10d10.1007_s10273-016-2046-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brexit Poker — Wer hat die besseren Karten in den Austrittsverhandlungen?
[Brexit Poker — Who Holds the Better Cards in the Withdrawal Negotiations?]

Author

Listed:
  • Hans-Bernd Schäfer

    (Bucerius Law School)

  • Arkadiusz Radwan

    (Kubas Kos Gałkowski)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Die politische, wirtschaftliche und rechtliche Lage Großbritanniens gegenüber der Europäischen Union nach dem EU-Mitgliedschaftsreferendum und im Vorfeld der Austrittsverhandlungen stellt sich ungewiss dar. Die Autoren fassen die verfassungsrechtliche Kontroverse über die Kompetenz- und Verfahrensfragen zur rechtmäßigen Brexit-Durchführung zusammen. Darüber hinaus geben sie einen Überblick, inwiefern der Vertrag über die Europäische Union und der Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union die Entscheidungsfindung der Verhandlungspartner determinieren. Vermutlich wird Großbritannien, um den Zugang zum europäischen Markt nicht zu verlieren und um seine Rolle als Finanzzentrum sowie als Tor zu Europa für private Investoren aus Drittländern weiter spielen zu können, Transferleistungen an die EU akzeptieren und wesentliche Bereiche des Acquis Communautaire beachten müssen.

Suggested Citation

  • Hans-Bernd Schäfer & Arkadiusz Radwan, 2016. "Brexit Poker — Wer hat die besseren Karten in den Austrittsverhandlungen? [Brexit Poker — Who Holds the Better Cards in the Withdrawal Negotiations?]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 96(10), pages 763-768, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:96:y:2016:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-016-2046-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-016-2046-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-016-2046-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-016-2046-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:96:y:2016:i:10:d:10.1007_s10273-016-2046-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.