IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i12d10.1007_s11269-025-04239-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term Simulation of Gross Primary Productivity and its Impact Evaluation Based on a Mechanism and Data Co-Driven Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojing Zhang

    (National Institute of Natural Hazards)

  • A. Yinglan

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Guoqiang Wang

    (Beijing Normal University
    Beijing Normal University)

  • Yuntao Wang

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Min Shi

    (Nantong University)

  • Jiping Yao

    (Inner Mongolia University)

  • Qingqing Fang

    (North China Electric Power University)

  • Libo Wang

    (Beijing Normal University)

  • Guangwen Ma

    (China National Environmental Monitoring Centre)

Abstract

Terrestrial Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) serves as a fundamental metric in carbon cycle investigations, offering insights into the health and resilience of terrestrial ecosystems. Long-term, high-precision GPP data facilitates comprehensive investigations into ecosystem dynamics and sustainability under the impacts of climate change and human activities. Here, we utilized the Noah-MP model, which simultaneously assimilates soil moisture data and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) data, to simulate GPP. However, the estimation of long-term (1982–2020) GPP in semi-arid regions was constrained by the lack of SIF data prior to 2000. Therefore, this study synergistically integrated a mechanistic model (Noah-MP) and a data-driven model (Unet model) to derive long-term GPP. The synergy between these two approaches addressed their respective limitations, achieving faster computational speeds and higher simulation accuracy. Results demonstrated that data assimilation techniques effectively enhanced the simulation accuracy of the mechanistic model, and the Unet model incorporating attention mechanisms (Attention-Unet model) better reconstructed the spatiotemporal GPP data from 1982 to 2020. Based on the simulations, ecological restoration projects significantly improved regional GPP, exhibiting distinct seasonality and zonality. However, influenced by climate change, the carbon sequestration capacity of natural vegetation zones experienced a marked decline in 2008, while human activities exerted significant positive impacts on agricultural areas (e.g., Hetao Irrigation District), offsetting some climate change effects in these regions. Although ecological restoration projects enhanced vegetation carbon sequestration at annual scales, this upward trend did not steadily persist with the advancement of ecological engineering initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojing Zhang & A. Yinglan & Guoqiang Wang & Yuntao Wang & Min Shi & Jiping Yao & Qingqing Fang & Libo Wang & Guangwen Ma, 2025. "Long-term Simulation of Gross Primary Productivity and its Impact Evaluation Based on a Mechanism and Data Co-Driven Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(12), pages 6027-6052, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04239-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-025-04239-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-025-04239-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-025-04239-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:12:d:10.1007_s11269-025-04239-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.