IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v33y2019i4d10.1007_s11269-018-2182-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Combinatorial Procedure to Determine the Full Range of Potential Operating Scenarios for a Dam System

Author

Listed:
  • Leanna M. King

    (The University of Western Ontario)

  • Andre Schardong

    (The University of Western Ontario)

  • Slobodan P. Simonovic

    (The University of Western Ontario)

Abstract

Traditional dam safety assessment tends to place the focus on estimating the probabilities of failure for the system based on a few subjectively-chosen operating scenarios. The techniques used to assess these systems rely on linear chains of events and are incapable of considering component interactions, feedbacks and non-linear behaviour. This paper uses a systems approach to develop a new technique that puts possibilities first and is capable of generating an exhaustive list of potential component operating state scenarios for the system. The scenarios can then be simulated using a Monte-Carlo approach to determine a wide range of system behaviour (outcomes) for each scenario, taking into account component interactions and feedbacks. A component operating states database is presented where the system can be broken down into various levels of detail and the operating states and causal factors for each component can be defined. The Cartesian product of each operating state set is used to derive the full range of potential operating scenarios, with each scenario consisting of a single operating state for every component in the system. The list of scenarios can be used as an input to a simulation model which can then be run many times for each scenario, using Monte-Carlo inputs which vary the timing and severity of events as well as the inflows. The approach for automated scenario generation is demonstrated on a simple and complex representation of a hydropower system and the scenarios are generated and counted. Results show that increasing system complexity results in exponentially increasing numbers of potential operating scenarios, with the simple system having a total of 1.1 × 106 operating states in comparison to the complex system which has 1.83 × 1027. The approach presented in this paper (a) reduces the subjectivity associated with traditional dam safety assessments through automated scenario generation, and (b) improves the ability to understand component interaction and feedbacks by describing a Monte Carlo simulation approach which can be used for scenario simulation. By understanding how the system responds to the full range of potential operating conditions, dam owners and asset managers can make informed decisions relating to the improvement of operating strategies and implementation of system upgrades.

Suggested Citation

  • Leanna M. King & Andre Schardong & Slobodan P. Simonovic, 2019. "A Combinatorial Procedure to Determine the Full Range of Potential Operating Scenarios for a Dam System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(4), pages 1451-1466, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2182-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-018-2182-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-018-2182-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-018-2182-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:33:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11269-018-2182-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.