IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/testjl/v23y2014i4p691-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two new methods for non-inferiority testing of the ratio in matched-pair setting

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Jin
  • Xiaobo Feng
  • Mingming Chen
  • Chenling Zhang

Abstract

Non-inferiority of one treatment to another based on ratio is a common issue in medical research. Nam and Blackwelder derived a Fieller-type statistic from constrained maximum likelihood estimation of nuisance parameters. Although it improved that of Lachenbruch and Lynch, its size still exceeds the claimed nominal level alpha for some cases. This is in accordance with Sidik who has found that the asymptotic tests are inaccurate in testing a hypothesis of a non-zero difference between marginal probabilities. In this paper, we extend Sidik’s exact tests to non-inferiority in ratio, and propose two new methods—one based on the standard $$p$$ p value and the other from restricted Bayesian estimation using an approximate $$p$$ p value. Our tests are both based on only one point of the two-dimension nuisance parameter space for accuracy improvement and computational purposes. The sizes and powers of our tests are considered. Simulation results suggest that our tests can control the type I error rates well with competitive powers while the Fieller-type statistic cannot for some cases be investigated. Copyright Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Jin & Xiaobo Feng & Mingming Chen & Chenling Zhang, 2014. "Two new methods for non-inferiority testing of the ratio in matched-pair setting," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(4), pages 691-707, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:23:y:2014:i:4:p:691-707
    DOI: 10.1007/s11749-014-0374-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11749-014-0374-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11749-014-0374-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Hua & Li, Song & Jin, Yaolan, 2016. "The IM-based method for testing the non-inferiority of odds ratio in matched-pairs design," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 145-151.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:testjl:v:23:y:2014:i:4:p:691-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.