IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v88y2025i3d10.1007_s11235-025-01326-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AI-enhanced IoT sensors for real-time crop monitoring: an era towards self-monitored agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Syed M. Zaigham Abbas Naqvi

    (Henan Agricultural University
    Henan International Joint Laboratory of Laser Technology in Agriculture Sciences)

  • M. Naveed Tahir

    (PMAS-Arid Agriculture University
    PMAS-Arid Agriculture University)

  • Vijaya Raghavan

    (McGill University)

  • M. Awais

    (Henan Agricultural University
    Henan International Joint Laboratory of Laser Technology in Agriculture Sciences)

  • Jiandong Hu

    (Henan Agricultural University
    Henan International Joint Laboratory of Laser Technology in Agriculture Sciences)

  • Yahia Said

    (Northern Border University)

  • Nashwan Adnan Othman

    (Knowledge University
    Al-Kitab University)

  • Mirjalol Ashurov

    (Tashkent State Pedagogical University)

  • M. Ijaz Khan

    (College of Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin)

Abstract

Smart farming is a rapidly growing field that uses sensors and internet of things (IoT) devices to collect and analyze data from farmlands and optimize crop production. This mini-ecosystem is potentially viable for gathering highly accurate information in real time. Still, continuously varying circumstances in the field pose the issues of self-degradation and noises during data collection. The current review covers different aspects of smart agriculture using artificially intelligent IoT platforms. Firstly, plant sensors for in vivo detections of plant signaling networks are briefly explained. Then there is a discussion that the data from various sensory devices for quantifying biomarker activities contain some noise which is refined using various algorithmic models. Proceedings further state that artificial intelligence (AI) helps to automate data acquisition with decreased human interference. Furthermore, different sensors are classified by their use in agriculture, with pros and cons for continuous monitoring and intelligent decisions. Plant wearable sensors have been discussed for their long-term data collection abilities from the field. Conclusively, plant wearable sensors are promising tools for smart agriculture, but they face some challenges such as biocompatibility, durability and scalability. From a future perspective, the current study comprehends the research gap to eliminate or reduce the issues of biodegradability and noise removal from the obtained data to perform more precise, continuous, and accurate data acquisitions remotely and smartly. Future research should focus on developing biodegradable microneedles, reducing the size of microneedles, creating biocompatible electrodes, and improving the performance of sensors in different climatic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed M. Zaigham Abbas Naqvi & M. Naveed Tahir & Vijaya Raghavan & M. Awais & Jiandong Hu & Yahia Said & Nashwan Adnan Othman & Mirjalol Ashurov & M. Ijaz Khan, 2025. "AI-enhanced IoT sensors for real-time crop monitoring: an era towards self-monitored agriculture," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:88:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-025-01326-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-025-01326-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-025-01326-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-025-01326-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foster, T. & Brozović, N. & Butler, A.P. & Neale, C.M.U. & Raes, D. & Steduto, P. & Fereres, E. & Hsiao, T.C., 2017. "AquaCrop-OS: An open source version of FAO's crop water productivity model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 18-22.
    2. Bharat S. Chaudhari & Marco Zennaro & Suresh Borkar, 2020. "LPWAN Technologies: Emerging Application Characteristics, Requirements, and Design Considerations," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuh-Ming Cheng & Mong-Fong Horng & Chih-Chao Chung, 2024. "ICT Innovation to Promote Sustainable Development Goals: Implementation of Smart Water Pipeline Monitoring System Based on Narrowband Internet of Things," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Alex Zizinga & Jackson Gilbert Majaliwa Mwanjalolo & Britta Tietjen & Bobe Bedadi & Ramon Amaro de Sales & Dennis Beesigamukama, 2022. "Simulating Maize Productivity under Selected Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Using AquaCrop Model in a Sub-humid Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Hu, Shiruo & Ding, Yueting & Cui, Shibo & Li, Yingjia & Zhao, Jianshi, 2025. "Assessing economic and hydrological effects of water-saving irrigation using a coupled SWAT–MODFLOW–AquaCrop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Masseroni, Daniele & Gangi, Fabiola & Galli, Andrea & Ceriani, Rodolfo & De Gaetani, Carlo & Gandolfi, Claudio, 2022. "Behind the efficiency of border irrigation: Lesson learned in Northern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    5. Foster, T. & Brozović, N., 2018. "Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 9-21.
    6. Nyathi, M.K. & Van Halsema, G.E. & Beletse, Y.G. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2018. "Nutritional water productivity of selected leafy vegetables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 111-122.
    7. Nyathi, M.K. & van Halsema, G.E. & Annandale, J.G. & Struik, P.C., 2018. "Calibration and validation of the AquaCrop model for repeatedly harvested leafy vegetables grown under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 107-119.
    8. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Sarah Ann Wheeler & Céline Nauges & R. Quentin Grafton, 2025. "Water pricing and markets: Principles, practices and proposals," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 487-514, May.
    10. Knowling, Matthew J. & Walker, Rob R. & Pellegrino, Anne & Edwards, Everard J. & Westra, Seth & Collins, Cassandra & Ostendorf, Bertram & Bennett, Bree, 2023. "Generalized water production relations through process-based modeling: A viticulture example," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    11. Feng, Dingrui & Li, Guangyong & Wang, Dan & Wulazibieke, Mierguli & Cai, Mingkun & Kang, Jing & Yuan, Zicheng & Xu, Houcheng, 2022. "Evaluation of AquaCrop model performance under mulched drip irrigation for maize in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    12. Bharat S. Chaudhari, 2025. "Enabling Tactile Internet via 6G: Application Characteristics, Requirements, and Design Considerations," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Anjali R. Askhedkar & Bharat S. Chaudhari & Maha Abdelhaq & Raed Alsaqour & Rashid Saeed & Marco Zennaro, 2023. "LoRa Communication Using TVWS Frequencies: Range and Data Rate," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Paloch Suchato & Taro Mieno & Karina Schoengold & Timothy Foster, 2022. "The potential for moral hazard behavior in irrigation decisions under crop insurance," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 257-273, March.
    15. Martins, Minella Alves & Tomasella, Javier & Dias, Cássia Gabriele, 2019. "Maize yield under a changing climate in the Brazilian Northeast: Impacts and adaptation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 339-350.
    16. Rouhi Rad, Mani & Brozović, Nicholas & Foster, Timothy & Mieno, Taro, 2020. "Effects of instantaneous groundwater availability on irrigated agriculture and implications for aquifer management," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Lu, Yang & Chibarabada, Tendai P. & Ziliani, Matteo G. & Onema, Jean-Marie Kileshye & McCabe, Matthew F. & Sheffield, Justin, 2021. "Assimilation of soil moisture and canopy cover data improves maize simulation using an under-calibrated crop model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    18. Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe & Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel & Taguta, Cuthbert & Sikka, Alok & Lautze, Jonathan, 2023. "Mapping Decision Support Tools (DSTs) on agricultural water productivity: A global systematic scoping review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    19. Nasih Abdulkarim Muhammed & Bakhtiar Ibrahim Saeed, 2025. "Design and Implementation of a Scalable LoRaWAN-Based Air Quality Monitoring Infrastructure for the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-34, August.
    20. Taguta, C. & Senzanje, A. & Kiala, Z. & Malota, M. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2022. "Water-energy-food nexus tools in theory and practice: a systematic review," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-4:837316..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:88:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-025-01326-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.