IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v84y2023i2d10.1007_s11235-023-01041-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network

Author

Listed:
  • R. Reka

    (Mahendra College of Engineering)

  • A. Manikandan

    (SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology)

  • C. Venkataramanan

    (Sri Eshwar College of Engineering)

  • R. Madanachitran

    (Kongunadu College of Engineering and Technology)

Abstract

In mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), when nodes sporadically visit every path, limiting battery life and leading to frequent topology changes, mobility awareness and energy efficiency are seen as two crucial advantages. The Enhanced Flock Optimization method, which was suggested by the Adaptive Location Routing Protocol method, is used to address these MANET issues. The powerful Chicken Swarm Optimization (CSO) algorithm is one of the most effective intelligent optimization approaches for handling global optimization issues. Applying an individual sigmoid function to flock optimization discretizes the problem. However, in complex GOPs with numerous defects, the CSO algorithm might not perform as predicted, invariably resulting in local minima. With the help of the biologically inspired algorithm Enhanced Chicken Swarm Optimization (ECSO), chicks are divided into smaller groups to mimic the foraging behaviour of a flock of chickens. Each subgroup iterates simultaneously toward the ideal group, with each member contributing something new. Thus, the concept of ECSO’s use in the cluster head selection process was inspired by it. The Adaptive Position Routing Protocol (APRP) strategy recommended for cluster leaders also makes advantage of network coding to minimize the number of broadcasts. Utilizing the parameters of energy efficiency, packet transmission rate, network throughput, and sensor node lifetime, the suggested strategy outperforms the alternatives. The simulation is performed as 20 times with same simulation parameter. As a consequence, the examination revealed that the average energy efficiency was 91.65% and the average packet transfer rate was 99.56%, lower average end-to-end latency to 270.68 ms. The ECSO-APRP protocol has a 576 average packet loss and average throughput of 691.87 Kbps for 500 nodes.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Reka & A. Manikandan & C. Venkataramanan & R. Madanachitran, 2023. "An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 183-202, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:84:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-023-01041-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vinay Rishiwal & Preeti Yadav & Omkar Singh & B. G. Prasad, 2021. "Optimizing Energy Consumption in IoT-Based Scalable Wireless Sensor Networks," International Journal of System Dynamics Applications (IJSDA), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:84:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11235-023-01041-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.