IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v63y2016i4d10.1007_s11235-016-0145-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recharging versus replacing sensor nodes using mobile robots for network maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Militano

    (Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria)

  • Milan Erdelj

    (University of Technology of Compiègne)

  • Antonella Molinaro

    (Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria)

  • Nathalie Mitton

    (Inria Lille-Nord Europe)

  • Antonio Iera

    (Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria)

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) have been of very high interest for the research community for years, but the quest for deploying a self-sustained network and effectively prolonging its lifetime has not found a satisfactory answer yet. Two main approaches can be identified that target this objective: either “recharging” or “replacing” the sensor nodes that are running out of energy. Of particular interest are solutions where mobile robots are used to execute the above mentioned tasks to automatically and autonomously maintain the WSN, thus reducing human intervention. Recently, the progress in wireless power transfer techniques has boosted research activities in the direction of battery recharging, with high expectations for its application to WSNs. Similarly, also sensor replacement techniques have been widely studied as a means to provide service continuity in the network. The objective of this paper is to investigate the limitations and the advantages of these two research directions. Key decision points must be identified for effectively supporting WSN self-maintenance: (i) which sensor nodes have to be recharged/replaced; (ii) in which order the mobile robot is serving (i.e., recharging/replacing) the nodes and by following which path; (iii) how much energy is delivered to a sensor when recharged. The influence that a set of parameters, relative to both the sensors and the mobile robot, has on the decisions will be considered. Centralized and distributed solutions are compared in terms of effectiveness in prolonging the network lifetime and in allowing network self-sustainability. The performance evaluation in a variety of scenarios and network settings offers the opportunity to draw conclusions and to discuss the boundaries for one technique being preferable to the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Militano & Milan Erdelj & Antonella Molinaro & Nathalie Mitton & Antonio Iera, 2016. "Recharging versus replacing sensor nodes using mobile robots for network maintenance," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 625-642, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:63:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11235-016-0145-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-016-0145-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-016-0145-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-016-0145-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:63:y:2016:i:4:d:10.1007_s11235-016-0145-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.