IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v38y2025i4d10.1007_s11213-025-09742-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on ‘Stepping Back from the Brink’ : Recognising we are Systemic Interbeings and the Implications for Ethics, Democracy and Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Janet J. McIntyre-Mills

    (University of Adelaide
    University of South Africa)

Abstract

Social, economic and environmental challenges pose unprecedented existential risks. Humanity faces an uncertain future with the following scenarios: a) chaos as emergent AIs are programmed by a narrow data set of programmers that exclude the interests of the voiceless and displaced, b) top down control by autocrats with their own agendas, or c) expanding the data set to include cross checks by all those who are at the receiving end of policy decisions – based on local communities learning what works why and how in nature’s class room. The third option could be the best way to construct a new narrative. AI is not infallible and if we replace biological knowing – based on testing out what works why and how in context then we risk losing generations of species knowledge. Our strategy in a community of practice linked with participating university, community, GO and NGO organisations is to navigate pathways through the current social, economic and environmental challenges based on working in small projects and testing out ideas respectfully in context with those who are to be at the receiving end of a policy decision. This makes sense empirically and ethically. One of the ways for achieving better governance and better democratic processes is through enabling local stakeholders to consider the implications of their decisions for this generation and the next in terms of basic needs, such as water, food and energy supply within a safe space. This is a common need spanning many species and it could help to enhance representation and accountability and to reduce displacement and dispossession by protecting habitat. One of the ways in which this could be achieved is through scaling up prefigurative case studies at a regional level spanning remote, rural and urban communities. Turning our backs on technology and hoping it will go away is no solution. Instead, our approach is to try to address a middle path of engaging ‘from below’ with marginalised groups who are not represented by current programmers. Instead, we propose a way forward based on a small prefigurative engagement groups linked with a broad community of practice(CoP) spanning universities, community and related organisations to foster the notion that there are ‘ no limits to hope’.

Suggested Citation

  • Janet J. McIntyre-Mills, 2025. "Reflections on ‘Stepping Back from the Brink’ : Recognising we are Systemic Interbeings and the Implications for Ethics, Democracy and Governance," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1-29, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09742-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-025-09742-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-025-09742-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-025-09742-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09742-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.