IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v38y2025i3d10.1007_s11213-025-09726-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective

Author

Listed:
  • James David Fox

    (University of Exeter)

Abstract

This article explores the facilitation of productive disagreement within democratic spaces. The research shows that designing democratic organisations around both processes of agreement and spaces of disagreement go hand-in-hand as two sides of developing viable and emancipatory democratic organisations. The latter create the conditions for participants to intervene within power structures and for collectivists to emancipate themselves from organisational conventions. Furthermore, by mapping this opposition onto Beer’s classic variety engineering loop, a novel cybernetic political category is revealed: variety recounting. The findings emerge from a three-year investigation of a democratic cola-collective named Premium Collective, and studies how their unique organisational strategies and policies assisted in their survival of the Covid-19 pandemic. Their use of an open, digital forum allowed them to overcome the challenges of the pandemic despite the beverage industry being among the hardest hit by the virus. This work provides an advance in the design of participatory cybernetics, showing that organisational viability and emancipatory democratic practice are not only mutually compatible, but are tightly interlinked.

Suggested Citation

  • James David Fox, 2025. "Dis/Agreement and Recounting Variety in a Self-Managing Cola Collective," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09726-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-025-09726-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-025-09726-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-025-09726-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:38:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11213-025-09726-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.