IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v31y2018i6d10.1007_s11213-018-9446-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvements in Introductory Programming Course: Action Research Insights and Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Sohail Iqbal Malik

    (Buraimi University College)

Abstract

Programming is a rewarding and yet demanding field in the ICT labormarket, but it is considered a challenging and difficult area of learning for significant numbers of novice programmers. As a result, high attrition rates from introductory programming (IP) courses are reported despite extensive research which attempts to address the issue. In this research, an action research methodology was used with three cycles to investigate and improve the teaching and learning process of the IP course. There were nine activities performed during the span of these three cycles. All three entities of the didactic triangle (student, instructor, and content) together with learning context were incorporated into the research design to understand the problem better and execute the proposed solution. The result shows that three cycles of the action research methodology helps in understanding and improving the students learning outcomes in the IP course. Moreover, the attrition rate was also reduced in the IP course.

Suggested Citation

  • Sohail Iqbal Malik, 2018. "Improvements in Introductory Programming Course: Action Research Insights and Outcomes," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 31(6), pages 637-656, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:31:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-018-9446-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-018-9446-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-018-9446-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-018-9446-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:31:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-018-9446-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.