IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v29y2016i2d10.1007_s11213-015-9355-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Design for Applying the Combined Use of SSM and CDA to Social Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Jae Eon Yu

    (Keimyung University)

  • Hyo Chang Hong

    (Marshall University)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a framework for applying the combined use of soft systems methodology (SSM) and critical discourse analysis (CDA) based on social semiotic systemic functional linguistics to social practices. In the social practice, ‘participation’ mode of Checkland’s SSM is used for ‘problem-solving’ whilst CDA is used to problematize ‘problem-solving’ processes within the practice. During the meta-process of problematization of our research, we used Churchman’s systems approach and its theory of ‘boundary critique’ in order to explore issues such as governance, inequality of power, and social values within the organization examined for this study. In other words, the process-oriented methodology proposed in this paper consists of two processes: that of ‘problem-solving’ based on SSM and of problematization of naturalized discourse from the perspective of CDA and two phases of boundary critique in social practice. A detailed account of a case study of Korean social enterprise is given to demonstrate how our proposed framework of the combined use of SSM and CDA is applied into practice. Reflecting the outcome of the case study, this paper argues that critical social research from systemic inquiry using what we call ‘process-oriented methodology’ is useful to address some of the social and complex issues related to understanding dynamic relation between power and discourse amongst participants in the social enterprise in Korean contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jae Eon Yu & Hyo Chang Hong, 2016. "Systemic Design for Applying the Combined Use of SSM and CDA to Social Practices," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 149-171, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-015-9355-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-015-9355-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-015-9355-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-015-9355-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Matthews, 2008. "Metadecision making: rehabilitating interdisciplinarity in the decision sciences," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 157-179, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    2. Andrés Esteban Acero López & María Catalina Ramirez Cajiao & Mauricio Peralta Mejia & Luisa Fernanda Payán Durán & Edier Ernesto Espinosa Díaz, 2019. "Participatory Design and Technologies for Sustainable Development: an Approach from Action Research," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 167-191, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adinolfi, Paola, 2021. "A journey around decision-making: Searching for the “big picture” across disciplines," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 9-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:29:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11213-015-9355-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.