IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sumafo/v29y2021i2d10.1007_s00550-021-00522-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of beneficiated phosphate rock production in Tunisia
[Ökobilanz der Produktion von aufbereitetem Phosphatgestein in Tunesien (von der Wiege bis zu Bahre)]

Author

Listed:
  • Roukaya Issaoui

    (Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS)/Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie (KIT))

  • Christine Rösch

    (Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS)/Karlsruhe Institut für Technologie (KIT))

  • Jörg Woidasky

    (Institut for Industrial Ecology (INEC)/Hochschule Pforzheim)

  • Mario Schmidt

    (Institut for Industrial Ecology (INEC)/Hochschule Pforzheim)

  • Tobias Viere

    (Institut for Industrial Ecology (INEC)/Hochschule Pforzheim)

Abstract

To improve the sustainable management of phosphorus, numerous LCA studies, using primary data, have been conducted for phosphorus recovery technologies from wastewater, but not for phosphate rock mining. This article addresses this issue by conducting a cradle to gate assessment of beneficiated phosphate rock production using primary data. This study aims to share an updated Life Cycle Inventory dataset of beneficiated phosphate rock production. The studied system is the open-pit mining operations and the wet beneficiation process located in the south of Tunisia. The functional unit is 1 kg of P2O5. Twelve environmental impact categories were assessed using the ReCiPe Midpoint method. The results of Life Cycle Inventory show that the average loss of phosphorus between mining operations, mechanical preparation, and the wet beneficiation is 0.3 kg of P2O5 per 1 kg P2O5. The losses occur mainly during the scrubbing and hydrocycloning. Compared to the production system in Florida, USA, according to the Ecoinvent database 3.4, the production of 1 kg P2O5 in Tunisia has higher Global Warming Potenzial, higher water depletion potential, higher PM10 emission, Photochemical oxidant formation, soil pollution potential, and human toxicity potential. In conclusion, primary data shows comparable results to the generic Life cycle Inventory of wet beneficiation phosphate rock in the Ecoinvent database. This study contributes to enlarge data about sedimentary phosphate rock extraction and beneficiation globally as currently only the USA and Morocco were reported in databases.

Suggested Citation

  • Roukaya Issaoui & Christine Rösch & Jörg Woidasky & Mario Schmidt & Tobias Viere, 2021. "Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of beneficiated phosphate rock production in Tunisia [Ökobilanz der Produktion von aufbereitetem Phosphatgestein in Tunesien (von der Wiege bis zu Bahre)]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 107-118, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:29:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00550-021-00522-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s00550-021-00522-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00550-021-00522-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00550-021-00522-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mario Schmidt, 2021. "Klimaschutz, Ressourcenschonung und Circular Economy als Einheit denken [Thinking of climate protection, resources conservation and the circular economy as a unit]," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 57-64, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sumafo:v:29:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00550-021-00522-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.