IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stpapr/v58y2017i2d10.1007_s00362-015-0699-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Admissible and minimax estimation of the parameter of the selected Pareto population under squared log error loss function

Author

Listed:
  • Nader Nematollahi

    (Allameh Tabataba’i University)

Abstract

The problem of estimation after selection arises when we select a population from the given k populations by a selection rule, and estimate the parameter of the selected population. In this paper we consider the problem of estimation of the scale parameter of the selected Pareto population $$\theta _{M}$$ θ M (or $$\theta _{J}$$ θ J ) under squared log error loss function. The uniformly minimum risk unbiased (UMRU) estimator of $$\theta _{M}$$ θ M and $$\theta _{J}$$ θ J are obtained. In the case of $$k=2,$$ k = 2 , we give a sufficient condition for minimaxity of an estimator of $$\theta _{M}$$ θ M and $$\theta _{J},$$ θ J , and show that the UMRU and natural estimators of $$\theta _{J}$$ θ J are minimax. Also the class of linear admissible estimators of $$\theta _{M}$$ θ M and $$\theta _{J}$$ θ J are obtained which contain the natural estimator. By using the Brewester–Ziedeck technique we find sufficient condition for inadmissibility of some scale and permutation invariant estimators of $$\theta _{J},$$ θ J , and show that the UMRU estimator of $$\theta _{J}$$ θ J is inadmissible. Finally, we compare the risk of the obtained estimators numerically, and discuss the results for selected uniform population.

Suggested Citation

  • Nader Nematollahi, 2017. "Admissible and minimax estimation of the parameter of the selected Pareto population under squared log error loss function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 319-339, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-015-0699-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s00362-015-0699-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00362-015-0699-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00362-015-0699-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Somesh & Mahapatra, Ajaya Kumar & Vellaisamy, P., 2009. "Reliability estimation of the selected exponential populations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(11), pages 1372-1377, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lakshmi Kanta Patra & Suchandan Kayal & Somesh Kumar, 2020. "Estimating a function of scale parameter of an exponential population with unknown location under general loss function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2511-2527, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riyadh Rustam Al-Mosawi & Shahjahan Khan, 2018. "Estimating moments of a selected Pareto population under asymmetric scale invariant loss function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 183-198, March.
    2. Morteza Amini & Nader Nematollahi, 2017. "Estimation of the Parameters of a Selected Multivariate Population," Sankhya A: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 13-38, February.
    3. Mohd. Arshad & Neeraj Misra, 2016. "Estimation after selection from exponential populations with unequal scale parameters," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 605-621, September.
    4. Riyadh Al-mosawi, 2012. "Simultaneous estimation following subset selection of binomial populations," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 70(1), pages 59-69, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:58:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s00362-015-0699-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.