IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v34y2025i4d10.1007_s10260-025-00794-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From animal testing to in Silico models: a systematic review and practical guide to cosmetic assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara G. Vasiljev

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Lucia Salvioni

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Miriam Colombo

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Paolo Galli

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

  • Francesca Greselin

    (University of Milano-Bicocca)

Abstract

Assessing the safety and efficacy of skincare products has become increasingly important, with the rise of alternative methods to animal testing, due to ethical and regulatory demands. We reviewed the integration of classical statistical techniques with modern in Silico approaches, providing a structured guide for researchers. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic PubMed search for studies applying statistical or computational methodologies to assess cosmetic product safety and efficacy, and published between 2013 and 2023. Papers lacking methodological rigor or clear application to cosmetics were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened studies to minimize bias, and only peer-reviewed articles were included. Tables and figures were prepared to synthesize the main results. A total of 195 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our findings highlight the increasing role of in Silico approaches and machine learning techniques in cosmetic safety evaluation, alongside traditional statistical methods such as regression analysis, hypothesis testing, and multivariate techniques. The review provides practical guidance on selecting methodologies based on data availability and research objectives, along with a critical analysis of their strengths and limitations. The findings are shaped by search keywords, which may have excluded some related studies. In Silico methods emerge as promising alternatives to animal testing, though their reliability depends on robust validation and high-quality datasets. Standardization and regulatory integration are crucial for broader adoption in cosmetic science.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara G. Vasiljev & Lucia Salvioni & Miriam Colombo & Paolo Galli & Francesca Greselin, 2025. "From animal testing to in Silico models: a systematic review and practical guide to cosmetic assessment," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 34(4), pages 895-937, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:34:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-025-00794-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-025-00794-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-025-00794-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-025-00794-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:34:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-025-00794-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.