Protection of privacy in efficient application of randomized response techniques
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Martin J. Cox & David L. Borchers & David A. Demer & George R. Cutter & Andrew S. Brierley, 2011. "Estimating the density of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) from multi‐beam echo‐sounder observations using distance sampling methods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 301-316, March.
- T. A. Marques & S. T. Buckland & D. L. Borchers & D. Tosh & R. A. McDonald, 2010. "Point Transect Sampling Along Linear Features," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1247-1255, December.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Sabrina Giordano & Pier Perri, 2012. "Efficiency comparison of unrelated question models based on same privacy protection degree," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 987-999, November.
More about this item
KeywordsEfficiency vs. Privacy; Equal and unequal probability sampling; Measures of jeopardy; Randomized response models; MSC 62D05;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:18:y:2009:i:3:p:389-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .