Author
Listed:
- Renae Wilkinson
(Harvard University, Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science)
- Koichiro Shiba
(Boston University School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology)
- Cristina B. Gibson
(Pepperdine University, Pepperdine Graziadio Business School)
- Chukwuemeka N. Okafor
(University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Long School of Medicine)
- Ying Chen
(Harvard University, Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology)
- R. Noah Padgett
(Harvard University, Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology)
- Byron R. Johnson
(Harvard University, Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Baylor University, Institute for Studies of Religion
Pepperdine University, School of Public Policy)
- Tyler J. VanderWeele
(Harvard University, Human Flourishing Program, Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics)
Abstract
While prior research has demonstrated that social relationships meaningfully shape health and well-being, less is known about how subjective evaluations of the quality of one’s relationships differ across national contexts and across sociodemographic groups within different countries. Using data from the Global Flourishing Study, a large international sample of 202,898 adults from 22 countries, we examined the average level and distributions of social relationship quality by sociodemographic characteristics across and within these countries. Our results showed variation in social relationship quality across nations, with averages in most countries between 7 and 8 (on a scale from 0 to 10). Higher average scores were observed in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Mexico, and lower averages were shown in Japan, Turkey, and Australia. The meta-analytic results showed variation in social relationship quality across most sociodemographic factors examined, most notably patterns of increasing social relationship quality by age and frequency of religious service attendance. For marital status, married and widowed adults reported higher social relationship quality, while separated and divorced adults reported comparatively lower social relationship quality. Variation was also observed by employment status, with retired adults reporting the highest social relationship quality and unemployed adults the lowest. These patterns varied across nations in country-specific, nationally representative analyses. Findings from this study provide insight into the population distributions of social relationship quality—a key social factor influencing well-being—and lay a foundation for future investigation into the sociocultural influences that contribute to social relationship quality around the world.
Suggested Citation
Renae Wilkinson & Koichiro Shiba & Cristina B. Gibson & Chukwuemeka N. Okafor & Ying Chen & R. Noah Padgett & Byron R. Johnson & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2026.
"Strangers, Friends, and Everything Between: Sociodemographic Variation in Social Relationship Quality Across 22 Countries,"
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 1-24, January.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:soinre:v:181:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03743-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03743-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:181:y:2026:i:1:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03743-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.