Author
Listed:
- Georg Henning
(German Centre of Gerontology)
- Dikla Segel-Karpas
(University of Haifa)
- Martin Hyde
(University of Leicester)
- Oliver Huxhold
(German Centre of Gerontology)
Abstract
The transition to retirement often coincides with changes in important aspects of daily life and social roles. This can be a demanding experience for some retirees, affecting their mental health. It is thus important to identify relevant predictors of the adjustment quality. Retiring during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been particularly challenging, as newly retired older adults had fewer opportunities to establish new leisure activities and social relationships due to limitations on in-person meetings and travel. Our study is based on the German Ageing Survey, a longitudinal multi-cohort survey of Germans aged 40 and older. Here, we included two groups: Workers retiring during or just before the first wave of the pandemic (2019-early 2021, n = 175) versus workers retiring long before the pandemic (2015–2017, n = 211). We compared both groups in terms of retirement adjustment, measured by perceived adjustment difficulty (in 2017 for the control group and in 2020/21 for the COVID-19 group) and change in life satisfaction across the transition (2014–2017 or 2017–2020/21, respectively). We further investigated whether pre-retirement engagement in social activities, generalized self-efficacy, online activities or disease load were associated with adjustment. Groups did not differ in their retirement adjustment. A higher generalized self-efficacy was associated with better adjustment. Social activities before retirement were only associated with increases in life satisfaction among those retiring before the pandemic. We discuss our findings with respect to the literature on predictors of retirement adjustment, as well as on the effects of the pandemic on psychosocial functioning.
Suggested Citation
Georg Henning & Dikla Segel-Karpas & Martin Hyde & Oliver Huxhold, 2025.
"Retirement Adjustment in the Pandemic – Did Risk- and Protective Factors Change??,"
Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 1615-1635, September.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03680-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-025-03680-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:179:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11205-025-03680-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.