IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: An experimental examination

Listed author(s):
  • Steven R. Beckman


    (Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Denver, Campus Box 181, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA)

  • Buhong Zheng


    (Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Denver, Campus Box 181, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA)

  • John P. Formby

    (Department of Economics Finance and Legal Studies, PO Box 870224, Tuscaloosa AL 35487-0024, USA)

  • W. James Smith


    (Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Denver, Campus Box 181, P.O. Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA)

Economists have long speculated that envy and malice play important roles in economic decisions. Surprisingly little empirical evidence has been offered in support of such claims. This paper uses experimental and multinomial logit techniques to estimate the effects of envy and malice in economic decisions involving Pareto efficiency. Envy and malice turn out to be powerful motivations with strong differential impacts across countries and relative positions. In some cases, opposition to Pareto gains reaches 60%. Behind a veil of ignorance, however, opposition falls to 10% overall. Pareto efficiency thus garners its greatest support under conditions which can lay claim to greatest legitimacy, those free of situational and personal bias. "... the greater part of human actions have their origin not in logical reasoning but in sentiment. This is particularly true for actions that are not motivated economically.... Man, although impelled to act by nonlogical motives, likes to tie his actions logically to certain principles; he therefore invents these a posteriori in order to justify his actions." V. Pareto in The rise and fall of the elites (1968, p. 27)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Springer & The Society for Social Choice and Welfare in its journal Social Choice and Welfare.

Volume (Year): 19 (2002)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 349-367

in new window

Handle: RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:19:y:2002:i:2:p:349-367
Note: Received: 2 February 2000/Accepted: 6 November 2000
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Web page:

More information through EDIRC

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:19:y:2002:i:2:p:349-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

or (Rebekah McClure)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.