Rational choice and revealed preference without binariness
This paper attempts to provide a unified account of the rationalization of possibly non-binary choice-functions by "Extended Preference Relations" (relations between sets and elements). The analysis focuses on transitive EPRs for which three choice-functional characterizations are given, two of them based on novel axioms. Transitive EPRs are shown to be rationalizable by sets of orderings that are "closed under compromise"; this novel requirement is argued to be the key to establish a canonical relationship between sets of orderings and choice-functions. The traditional assumption of "binariness" on preference relations or choice functions is shown to be analytically unhelpful and normatively unfounded; non-binariness may arise from "unresolvedness of preference", a previously unrecognized aspect of preference incompleteness.
Volume (Year): 14 (1997)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
|Note:||Received: 28 August 1995/Accepted: 14 February 1996|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.springer.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/economic+theory/journal/355|