Author
Listed:
- Koldanov P. A.
(National Research University Higher School of Economics (Laboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Network Analysis))
- Koldanov A. P.
(National Research University Higher School of Economics (Laboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Network Analysis))
- Tsygankov V. V.
(National Research University Higher School of Economics (Laboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Network Analysis))
Abstract
One of the popular tools for analyzing network models of a market is the threshold similarity graph or market graph, which illustrates the strength and topology of correlations in the stock market. Several papers are devoted to the construction of such a graph in order to analyze correlations in specific stock markets. However, the reliability or uncertainty of the conclusions obtained has not been sufficiently studied. To carry out such studies, we investigate some measures of uncertainty. These measures include classical measures based on risk function and new measures based on recently proposed methods for dividing conclusions about correlations into two sets: a statistically significant set of conclusions and a statistically nonsignificant set of conclusions or zone of uncertainty. The paper shows the relationship of some new measures of uncertainty with classical ones. The proposed measures of uncertainty include the ratio of the size of the nonsignificant set of conclusions to the total number of conclusions and the ratio of the size of the nonsignificant set of conclusions to the size of the significant set of conclusions. These measures are divided into two types. Measures of the first type are defined as functions of the chosen threshold of the market graph. The measures of the second type, or uncertainty indicators, do not depend on the threshold of the threshold similarity graph. Data from 12 stock markets are used to investigate the proposed measures of uncertainty. The correlation is estimated using both the traditional Pearson correlation coefficient and the Kendall correlation coefficient.
Suggested Citation
Koldanov P. A. & Koldanov A. P. & Tsygankov V. V., 2025.
"Uncertainty of Market Graph Identification,"
SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, December.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00563-5
DOI: 10.1007/s43069-025-00563-5
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00563-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.