IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/snopef/v6y2025i4d10.1007_s43069-025-00512-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Water Management Strategies at Oued Makhazine Dam: Assessing the Performance of Reinforcement Learning and Traditional Optimization Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Chakir Achahboun

    (Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine)

  • Mohamed Chikhaoui

    (Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine)

  • Mustapha Naimi

    (Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine)

  • Mostafa Bellafkih

    (National Institute of Posts and Telecommunications (INPT))

Abstract

Adaptive reservoir management is essential for semi-arid regions facing heightened climate variability and intensifying competition among water use sectors. Traditional rule-based and optimization-based approaches frequently lack the responsiveness needed to address hydrological extremes and shifting operational priorities. To address this gap, we present a systematic comparison of classical and artificial intelligence-based reservoir operation models under diverse hydrological scenarios. Four strategies—Linear Programming (LP), Stochastic Optimization (SO), Reinforcement Learning (RL), and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (HRL)—were evaluated for the Oued Makhazine Dam in northern Morocco using a combination of historical records and synthetically generated inflow and demands sequences simulating dry, historical, and rainy regimes. Model performance was assessed using comprehensive criteria, including allocation efficiency, sectoral demand satisfaction, safety margin, adaptability, reliability index, and the frequency of reservoir volume extremes. Results indicate that the SO model demonstrated superior overall performance under stable conditions, achieving the highest efficiency (72.13 ± 37.70%), irrigation satisfaction (92.43 ± 10.59%), drinking water satisfaction (99.63 ± 0.51%), and safety margin (55.84 ± 37.23%). While SO maintained a high average buffer, it also frequently reached maximum capacity during rainy periods, increasing the risk of overflow. HRL excelled in adaptability (82.09 ± 12.51%) and consistently ensured drinking water supply (98.02 ± 2.80%). RL showed high adaptability (82.30 ± 11.89%), indicating strong responsiveness to fluctuating demands. However, this flexibility came at the cost of greater reservoir volume variability (105.38 ± 56.43) and inconsistent drinking water satisfaction (84.67 ± 26.22%), particularly under dry conditions. LP achieved high satisfaction rates for drinking (96.97 ± 4.29%) and irrigation (77.50 ± 29.98%) but was less adaptable (71.15 ± 0.64%), limiting its performance under variable regimes.These findings underscore the advantages of SO under predictable conditions and highlight the adaptive potential of RL-based approaches for dynamic water management. The study contributes to the evaluation of reservoir operation strategies under climate uncertainty and supports the design of adaptive methodologies for sustainable water resource management in semi-arid environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakir Achahboun & Mohamed Chikhaoui & Mustapha Naimi & Mostafa Bellafkih, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Water Management Strategies at Oued Makhazine Dam: Assessing the Performance of Reinforcement Learning and Traditional Optimization Methods," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-45, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00512-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s43069-025-00512-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43069-025-00512-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s43069-025-00512-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:snopef:v:6:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s43069-025-00512-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.