IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v56y2003i3d10.1023_a1022326820017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The visibility of Italian journals

Author

Listed:
  • Donatella Ugolini

    (Università di Genova Largo R)

  • Cristina Casilli

    (Università di Genova Largo R)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to analyze the Italian journals indexed in the 2000 edition of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) published by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) (Philadelphia, USA). The performance and the visibility of these journals were evaluated in terms of Impact Factor (IF), mean IF from citing journals and cited journals, and self-citing and self-cited rates. Seventy-three Italian journals were indexed in the JCR, 14 of which achieved an IF equal to or higher than one. Most citing journals were European and American, thus showing a fairly good visibility of the articles published in the 14 journals analyzed. The self-citing and self-cited rates showed a wide variation. The journal that appeared to perform best was theJournal of High Energy Physics, an electronic publication whose success seemingly confirms Internet circulation as an effective means to enhance the visibility and consequently the quality, in term of citations, of a journal. Italy's low overall expenditure on research & development (R&D) and low number of researchers compared to countries with longstanding high publishing standards and traditions are no doubt partly to blame for its poor performance in scientific publishing.

Suggested Citation

  • Donatella Ugolini & Cristina Casilli, 2003. "The visibility of Italian journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 345-355, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:56:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022326820017
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1022326820017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1022326820017
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1022326820017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wladimir J. Alonso & Esteban Fernández-Juricic, 2002. "Regional network raises profile of local journals," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6871), pages 471-472, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Cavacini, 2015. "What is the best database for computer science journal articles?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2059-2071, March.
    2. Mee-Jean Kim, 2010. "Visibility of Korean science journals: an analysis between citation measures among international composition of editorial board and foreign authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 505-522, August.
    3. Mladen Andreis & Maja Jokić, 2008. "An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975–2001," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 263-288, May.
    4. Dario Sambunjak & Ana Ivaniš & Ana Marušić & Matko Marušić, 2008. "Representation of journals from five neighboring European countries in the Journal Citation Reports," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(2), pages 261-271, August.
    5. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:56:y:2003:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1022326820017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.