Author
Listed:
- Haotian Xu
(Peking University)
- Wenqin Shen
(Peking University)
Abstract
Gender gaps in research productivity have long been a concern, with caregiving responsibilities and family dynamics identified as key factors. This study utilizes data from the 2021 and 2023 surveys of Chinese PhD graduates to investigate how marital and parental status influence research productivity, with a particular focus on the compounded decline in productivity experienced by women after marriage and childbirth. To address potential biases, an instrumental variable (IV) approach is employed, revealing a self-selection effect: some female doctoral students may deliberately avoid parenthood due to inadequate support, thereby skewing observed outcomes. The results reveal that the “marriage benefit” is primarily observed among male PhD students, whose expected research output is 7.1% higher than that of their unmarried peers. In contrast, this benefit is absent for female PhD students, who instead face a significant “motherhood penalty”: the expected research output for married women with children declines by 30.7%. Moreover, socio-economic status (SES) significantly moderates this penalty. For married women with children, a higher SES background provides a substantial buffering effect; each one-unit increase in the SES score is associated with an additional productivity boost of 16.8% in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and 12.0% in Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS). These findings underscore the need for institutional support, including flexible academic schedules, parental leave, and targeted financial support, to assist female doctoral students—especially those from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds—in balancing academic and family responsibilities.
Suggested Citation
Haotian Xu & Wenqin Shen, 2025.
"The double penalty of class and gender: the research productivity of married female doctoral students,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 4117-4140, July.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05375-2
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05375-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05375-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.