IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i7d10.1007_s11192-025-05353-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science

Author

Listed:
  • Mollie Hawkes Hohmann

    (The University of Adelaide)

  • Adrian G. Barnett

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Neil King

    (Queensland University of Technology)

  • Sean D. Connell

    (The University of Adelaide)

Abstract

For at least a century, scientists have been concerned with the need for clear scientific writing. This concern has grown with the advent of the internet allowing for global, interdisciplinary collaboration. In this study, we used R software to analyse over twenty million abstracts from scientific papers in the health and medical fields — tracking changes in the frequency with which different writing components have been used since the 1950s. This historical understanding provides insight into our past writing cultures, how they have changed, and where we stand as science communicators today. We found that scientists are increasingly using writing components that reduce cognitive load and improve reader understanding. Despite these positive efforts we found that many scientists still feel a need to adhere to ‘The Official Style’ that falls back on dense and difficult prose. We advocate for more accessible science writing so that its discoveries not only encourage inter-disciplinary research, but are also spread across wider society as part of the sharing of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Mollie Hawkes Hohmann & Adrian G. Barnett & Neil King & Sean D. Connell, 2025. "The evolution of scientific writing: an analysis of 20 million abstracts over 70 years in health and medical science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3349-3366, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05353-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05353-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05353-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05353-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05353-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.