IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i4d10.1007_s11192-025-05292-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can altmetric mentions reflect the quality of evidence? A study in Biomedical and Life Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar Valderrama

    (Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR))

  • Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado

    (University of Granada)

  • Adela Baca

    (University of Granada)

  • Daniel Torres-Salinas

    (University of Granada)

Abstract

Although the importance of the social impact of research continues to gain recognition, the extent of its utility is still up for debate. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether the altmetric mentions of publications in Biomedical and Life Sciences are associated with the study design, in view of the “pyramid” of scientific evidence. Data were obtained from PubMed and Altmetric.com. A total of 382,882 documents from 2020to 2021 and corresponding to the following study designs were obtained: Consensus Development Conferences & Guidelines, Systematic Reviews and/or Meta-analysis, Clinical Trials, Observational Studies, Reviews, and Case Reports. The indicators considered were Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), News mentions, Twitter mentions, Facebook mentions, Mendeley readers and Dimensions citations. Only documents with at least one mention/citation were retrieved. Reviews made up 53.9% of the output, followed by Case Reports (17%), while the least frequent was Consensus & Guidelines (0.5%). For each indicator, comparison of mentions/citations among the study designs by the Kruskal–Wallis test gave significant differences in all cases. The hierarchical order occupied by the study designs showed some variations for the different indicators. Global analysis of the altmetrics, could reflect the level of the pyramid of scientific evidence: Consensus Development & Guidelines is situated at the top, but it is followed by Clinical Trial rather than Systematic Review/Meta-analysis. The application of altmetrics to Biomedical and Life Sciences can be useful to discriminate between different study designs and would help identify the most appropriate ones for clinical decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar Valderrama & Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado & Adela Baca & Daniel Torres-Salinas, 2025. "Can altmetric mentions reflect the quality of evidence? A study in Biomedical and Life Sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(4), pages 2345-2356, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05292-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05292-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05292-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05292-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05292-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.